MSDS论坛_msds查询_msds安全网

 找回密码
 注册

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 3298|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[分享] 重要:高关注度物质最新进展

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
flyfish 发表于 2009-12-8 13:26:44 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
据Chemical
3 Y5 J' m; M/ [$ J2 v
: S4 Q5 N2 M% L2 k; b9 V( X3 qwatch 12月4日发布的消息,关于第二批15个待定的高关注度物质,各成员国已经一致同意将其确定SVHC,ECHA预计这15个物质正式归入SVHC清单的时间约在2010年1月份左右。- ?0 u) P8 I( }, w: e; T
! d' ^5 O! f+ m1 C: U# |' a
3 ?: G: x) _2 W& V* q
英文来不及翻译,将就着看吧
" _7 K( A! Z8 b7 D, x6 tAll substances in latest raft of nominations unanimously accepted
' g4 s3 `0 F5 s4 ~+ b04-Dec-2009
0 s) v. a& }4 iYour free trial ends on 18 December
$ P4 x" u$ y8 _/ V4 c8 p, U  f3 `. ~" Z" D$ x" C0 i4 U3 `( w, L
2009. Subscribe Today* r% z6 b) U- w' [1 q7 V' r- w1 _+ v
The Member States Committee of the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) has unanimously agreed that a further 15 substances of very high
$ I$ e5 E8 a9 S* A6 `. K  M7 k7 Z  f6 k6 k& ?
concern (SVHC) should be included on the REACH Candidate List of substances that may require authorisation under REACH.
$ H  J3 b5 K5 \+ b7 pThe substances include five forms
/ l6 o. q5 e6 U. s5 @
, A1 v# N. R) pof the polyaromatic hydrocarbon anthracene, which is used to make rubber products. All are considered to be persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic. The others 3 ~% @5 u8 B8 f2 U5 q
9 u5 ~8 q7 X& B% @  Q: l
are high temperature coal tar pitch; acrylamide; 2,4-dinitrotoluene; lead chromate molybdate sulphate red; lead sulphochromate yellow; tris(2-chloroethyl)$ R$ o2 x! e0 W7 i

4 x5 Q: T: T1 H; S% ~phosphate;diisobutyl phthalate; aluminosilicate refractory ceramic fibres; zirconia aluminosilicate refractory fibres and lead chromate. Eight of the % `; J8 m# g1 |5 I' T4 G

3 U7 Y6 L( @2 q7 i- S0 m5 G  Unominations came from Germany (CW 1 September 2009
- s, R# r8 a2 y3 \) d, ?ECHA is expected to formally adopt the decision and publish the 15 substances identified as SVHCs on 4 f. {3 e2 ?( Q* `" ^0 m
& h# O; I( e; X2 K- w0 I
the Candidate List in January, bringing the total on the list to 30. This will trigger the right of consumers to ask for information about their inclusion in
7 _! x3 o* C, h1 E
; p8 V+ M0 d2 z+ `: M6 Sproducts, with a right of reply within 45 days.
- B$ Y* W( V. w: h9 _! }+ H% KThe Agency is expected to recommend which of the substances should be prioritised for authorisation, and . V- ^" |; g0 v- j9 z4 N6 b* h
* Y& {$ s/ m) N1 w. D- Y
thus included in Annex XIV, sometime in the second half of next year.
% J0 T: U: s* tThe committee also discussed ECHA's progress in refining its approach to the
, J6 y2 B' t1 a! s  g3 ~% F7 ?/ V* v0 u8 ]; T# a( T/ S- R! g: N+ D( C
prioritisation of SVHCs for inclusion in Annex XIV. Its approach is based on legal requirements set out in Article 58(3) of REACH, which defines three main ) `8 @2 s) U5 r* Z
3 X$ c7 q+ b$ A/ M/ {
prioritisation criteria – being produced in high volumes; or exhibiting persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) properties or very persistent, very 7 M8 I9 I1 q+ x; j7 x2 m

$ B7 Z9 s. f% V; I4 Qbioaccumulative (vPvB) properties; or having wide dispersive use.
9 |! H2 H6 G  M* x) f% g" }According to ECHA's guidance on its general approach to prioritisation, issued in June, ) |: j5 ^5 \* |2 n
" l- X1 p; b: m/ h6 m- b6 R
the three “are assessed together in a weight of evidence approach in a qualitative, where possible semi-quantitative manner, resulting in an overall : A4 Q$ `$ x+ C( P# O7 @
, i- y+ Z$ s  ?
conclusion on the priority of the substance. The number of criteria met and the extent to which the criteria are fulfilled (i.e. the higher the rating of the : q+ W- O% }* }' Y
" c8 D) Q' E* Q+ T. f$ p, O/ J
intrinsic properties, the more wide dispersive the uses and the higher the volumes not exempted from authorisation) are important factors in deciding whether
$ e% Z! E' `& _4 f: W' \2 w  Y* {+ ?$ D2 s7 W7 q/ z! e
or not to prioritise a substance.”$ d9 s1 |9 \' i. G- o" {2 U" W( Z5 N$ e
The committee supported ECHA's proposals but decided there are some small details that can be improved. One example 5 N+ f4 Z" D* ~2 r
# G4 L9 A7 L% l
would be to introduce a scoring system for information that is available, such as volume, with a substance's score varying according to its production 0 w' }4 H: m) c. t

) p( ~2 E+ G+ J8 d6 s% Tvolume. This would help to make ECHA's decisions more transparent. The Agency's proposals will be re-examined at the committee's next meeting on 27-28 . V- v% \) {# h# R5 N& g% l9 u4 o$ C

5 V7 C/ H0 W+ L9 U9 R$ SApril.
$ p& ?) Y1 ], Z+ AThe committee also discussed its first draft decision from the Agency on a REACH registrant's testing proposal, and accepted it unanimously.
3 m+ x: m5 [! H/ A' \
/ M8 ~( |7 @) P5 Z- K1 c- y- NDetails concerning the substance and registrant involved are confidential. The committee expects to receive further Agency draft decisions relating to
2 S4 e' E7 x! Q  h* ]) X8 h  P0 g8 n: ~1 b2 T7 j1 Q0 q% ~& z9 f
dossier compliance checks and testing proposals in the spring.
分享到:  微信微信
收藏收藏 分享分享
2#
zengjj 发表于 2013-2-1 09:41:49 | 只看该作者
我来帮你顶顶!呵呵
3#
zengjj 发表于 2013-3-26 20:20:21 | 只看该作者
都看了,这帖子有意思。
4#
interant 发表于 2013-8-16 15:45:29 | 只看该作者
支持楼主支持楼主支持楼主!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

关注微信 资源下载全免费

QQ|联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|MSDS论坛 ( 苏ICP备11014413号 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-29 06:17 , Processed in 0.206180 second(s), 17 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表